Longtails - Is Forshaw's new book wrong? Or is Morcombe?

Need some general finch keeping help? Ask your questions here.
User avatar
woodstockaus
...............................
...............................
Posts: 31
Joined: 21 Jul 2011, 14:22
Location: Melbourne Vic

tonytoast wrote:Too hard to follow....are Hecks red or yellow billed or both? Or is there no right answer?
Tony - I think we've wound up agreeing that the original edition of Morcombe was wrong, which is why it was corrected later - so the answer is that "normal" longtails have yellow bills and Hecks have red. Having said that, it's not clear-cut because there's a range of colours in between which may or may not depend on location.
User avatar
tonytoast
...............................
...............................
Posts: 156
Joined: 05 May 2011, 18:51
Location: Gold Coast

woodstockaus wrote:
tonytoast wrote:Too hard to follow....are Hecks red or yellow billed or both? Or is there no right answer?
Tony - I think we've wound up agreeing that the original edition of Morcombe was wrong, which is why it was corrected later - so the answer is that "normal" longtails have yellow bills and Hecks have red. Having said that, it's not clear-cut because there's a range of colours in between which may or may not depend on location.
Cheers...I think! You know, I have always called Chestnuts, Bullies and Redbrows, Redheads and Spice, Nutmegs (the list goes on)....I appreciate that at some point someone has to document a name BUT as long as we speak a similar language, ie Red Billed are Hecks, then all is well. I just get a bit embarrassed when I have been calling something a particular name for a long time and then find out that I have mislead....in this case, it would appear that I was ok! :thumbup:
User avatar
Myzomela
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1545
Joined: 24 Jan 2011, 18:44
Location: Melbourne Vic

This confusion is why the Europeans just call everything by their scientific name- then there is no confusion (except perhaps in this case because the literature is confusing).

I know that this is "Un- Australian"-way too formal for most of us but it does avoid confusion.
Research; evaluate;observe;act
User avatar
arthur
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1999
Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 10:22

Yes, I am looking out as I type at about 300/ 400 examples of 'lonchura castaneothorax'

Dry season and they flock . . always manage to find the old discarded seed

I'll bet if I could do a quick survey they would volunteer for aviary life :thumbup:
User avatar
mickw
...............................
...............................
Posts: 365
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 19:49
Location: Port Macquarie, NSW
Location: Port Macquarie

Myzomela wrote:This confusion is why the Europeans just call everything by their scientific name- then there is no confusion (except perhaps in this case because the literature is confusing).

I know that this is "Un- Australian"-way too formal for most of us but it does avoid confusion.
Well said Myzo.......it would indeed be confusing if we were to refer to you as Honey :?
User avatar
Myzomela
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1545
Joined: 24 Jan 2011, 18:44
Location: Melbourne Vic

:lol: :lol: :lol: -

I hope that's not a pick up line Mick!!!

Thanks but no thanks mate. I'm happily married. :D
Research; evaluate;observe;act
Post Reply

Return to “Finch Discussion & Questions”