Tony - I think we've wound up agreeing that the original edition of Morcombe was wrong, which is why it was corrected later - so the answer is that "normal" longtails have yellow bills and Hecks have red. Having said that, it's not clear-cut because there's a range of colours in between which may or may not depend on location.tonytoast wrote:Too hard to follow....are Hecks red or yellow billed or both? Or is there no right answer?
Longtails - Is Forshaw's new book wrong? Or is Morcombe?
- woodstockaus
- ...............................
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 21 Jul 2011, 14:22
- Location: Melbourne Vic
- tonytoast
- ...............................
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 05 May 2011, 18:51
- Location: Gold Coast
Cheers...I think! You know, I have always called Chestnuts, Bullies and Redbrows, Redheads and Spice, Nutmegs (the list goes on)....I appreciate that at some point someone has to document a name BUT as long as we speak a similar language, ie Red Billed are Hecks, then all is well. I just get a bit embarrassed when I have been calling something a particular name for a long time and then find out that I have mislead....in this case, it would appear that I was ok!woodstockaus wrote:Tony - I think we've wound up agreeing that the original edition of Morcombe was wrong, which is why it was corrected later - so the answer is that "normal" longtails have yellow bills and Hecks have red. Having said that, it's not clear-cut because there's a range of colours in between which may or may not depend on location.tonytoast wrote:Too hard to follow....are Hecks red or yellow billed or both? Or is there no right answer?

- Myzomela
- ...............................
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: 24 Jan 2011, 18:44
- Location: Melbourne Vic
This confusion is why the Europeans just call everything by their scientific name- then there is no confusion (except perhaps in this case because the literature is confusing).
I know that this is "Un- Australian"-way too formal for most of us but it does avoid confusion.
I know that this is "Un- Australian"-way too formal for most of us but it does avoid confusion.
Research; evaluate;observe;act
- arthur
- ...............................
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 10:22
Yes, I am looking out as I type at about 300/ 400 examples of 'lonchura castaneothorax'
Dry season and they flock . . always manage to find the old discarded seed
I'll bet if I could do a quick survey they would volunteer for aviary life
Dry season and they flock . . always manage to find the old discarded seed
I'll bet if I could do a quick survey they would volunteer for aviary life

- mickw
- ...............................
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 19:49
- Location: Port Macquarie, NSW
- Location: Port Macquarie
Well said Myzo.......it would indeed be confusing if we were to refer to you as HoneyMyzomela wrote:This confusion is why the Europeans just call everything by their scientific name- then there is no confusion (except perhaps in this case because the literature is confusing).
I know that this is "Un- Australian"-way too formal for most of us but it does avoid confusion.
