desertbirds wrote:Thanks, and i will try and post a bit of a super wren thingy soon, just trying to get good shots of White Winged and some better shots of Emu Wrens but its easier said than done. Love the flared cheek patches.
Hi Desert, I'm curious about the Emu Wrens, some say they are the smallest of all Aussie Wrens, they say they can squeeze through the 1/2 inch square wire. I have never seen them, are they really that small. I might be interested in a pair of preferably Mount Lofty Range subspecies. Also anyone knows has anyone bred them in captivity, as far as I know they haven't been bred in captivity. Although there are three species and seven subspecies, the subspecies called "Mallee Emu-Wrens" are the prettiest of the subspecies
http://bird.net.au/bird/index.php?title=Mallee_Emu-wren" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; the "Southern Emu-Wrens" are very rare and the subspecies from Mount Lofty Ranges "Mount Lofty Ranges Emu-Wrens" the rarest.
http://www.environment.gov.au/biodivers ... /emu-wren/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maybe the Barrow Island White-winged Wrens are the smallest, I'm not sure.
Here is an interesting article about the Mount Lofty Ranges Southern Emu-wren:
The critically endangered Mount Lofty Ranges Southern Emu-wren (Stipiturus malachurus intermedius) has been reintroduced to an area from which it was extirpated by wildfire almost 20 years ago. In July 2001, 30 emu-wrens (15 male, 15 female) were transferred from Deep Creek Conservation Park 50 km NE to Cox Scrub Conservation Park (540 ha), 50 km SSE of Adelaide. A further 16 were translocated in 2002. Southern Emu-wrens occurred in Cox Scrub Conservation Park until the fire burnt out the park in 1983, but being isolated from the nearest subpopulations, the park was not recolonised. Emu-wrens have short, rounded wings and cannot undertake sustained flight, and as such have very limited dispersal capabilities. The source population in Deep Creek Conservation Park is the largest known subpopulation of the subspecies, with at least several hundred individuals. Emu-wrens were trapped over several weeks, mostly as pairs, using mist-nets and pre-recorded calls to facilitate trapping, and transferred to the release site by road, generally on the day of capture. Monitoring during the first spring–summer breeding season revealed establishment of at least 8 breeding pairs and successful reproduction, with at least 10 young produced. Monitoring during the second breeding season revealed up to 14 pairs, persistence of several founder-group pairs formed during the 2001–2002 breeding season and further successful reproduction including breeding by some founder-group progeny. At least 13–16 fully-grown young were produced in 2002–2003. Emu-wrens are small (~ 7g), secretive birds that can hardly fly. Radio tracking is not feasible, so monitoring involves fairly arduous transect and area search methods in dense scrub, meaning that the population is probably larger than the number of birds detected.The project is funded primarily by the Commonwealth Government Endangered Species Program and S.A. Government Department for Environment and Heritage. The Conservation Council of S.A. administers the recovery program.
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~darmstro/au_projects.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;