Balancing the sex ratio
Posted: 24 Sep 2021, 15:36
Hey everyone,
I've recently read this article (linked below). In this, the researcher claims that Gouldian Finches choose the sex of their offspring based on the head colour of their male mate. Her findings suggest that pairs with matching head colours produce roughly equal numbers of males and females. Breeding pairs with different head colours over produce sons.
I'm wondering if any other breeders find this to be true? I myself find the opposite. I am inundated with female chicks at a ratio of around 3:1. My birds breed in an aviary and select their own partner. One BH, GB, PC SB male and RH, WC, GB, SB female are my most productive pair. On average she lays 6 eggs per clutch and chick mortality rate is exceptionally low for those two. In the last three years she's lost 2 chicks out of 33 raised chicks.
I also have a RH, YB, WC male and a BH, PC, GB female that over produce daughters. Their average egg count is lower and mortality rate is higher, 5 eggs per clutch and mortality rate around 15%. Of the 24 chicks these two have so far produced over the years, 19 have been female.
This same story is repeated throughout my aviary. Conversely, I do have two orange heads breeding together and they produce low numbers, often only raising two chicks per clutch - this year both were female!
Back to the study below - I wonder whether allowing females to choose their mate of their own free will plays a role in sex determination? In the study, although it doesn't say explicitly, it suggests that the pairings were researcher decided.
I'd love to hear your thoughts whether or not you're experiencing the same thing. If anyone can think of a reason why I'm getting so many females and what I might do to redress the situation, that would be appreciated. My Goulds are pampered and have absolutely everything they need! But I may be over looking something....
Pryke, S., & Griffith, S. (2009). Genetic Incompatibility Drives Sex Allocation and Maternal Investment in a Polymorphic Finch Science, 323 (5921), 1605–1607 | doi:10.1126/science.1168928.
I've recently read this article (linked below). In this, the researcher claims that Gouldian Finches choose the sex of their offspring based on the head colour of their male mate. Her findings suggest that pairs with matching head colours produce roughly equal numbers of males and females. Breeding pairs with different head colours over produce sons.
I'm wondering if any other breeders find this to be true? I myself find the opposite. I am inundated with female chicks at a ratio of around 3:1. My birds breed in an aviary and select their own partner. One BH, GB, PC SB male and RH, WC, GB, SB female are my most productive pair. On average she lays 6 eggs per clutch and chick mortality rate is exceptionally low for those two. In the last three years she's lost 2 chicks out of 33 raised chicks.
I also have a RH, YB, WC male and a BH, PC, GB female that over produce daughters. Their average egg count is lower and mortality rate is higher, 5 eggs per clutch and mortality rate around 15%. Of the 24 chicks these two have so far produced over the years, 19 have been female.
This same story is repeated throughout my aviary. Conversely, I do have two orange heads breeding together and they produce low numbers, often only raising two chicks per clutch - this year both were female!
Back to the study below - I wonder whether allowing females to choose their mate of their own free will plays a role in sex determination? In the study, although it doesn't say explicitly, it suggests that the pairings were researcher decided.
I'd love to hear your thoughts whether or not you're experiencing the same thing. If anyone can think of a reason why I'm getting so many females and what I might do to redress the situation, that would be appreciated. My Goulds are pampered and have absolutely everything they need! But I may be over looking something....
Pryke, S., & Griffith, S. (2009). Genetic Incompatibility Drives Sex Allocation and Maternal Investment in a Polymorphic Finch Science, 323 (5921), 1605–1607 | doi:10.1126/science.1168928.