Fincho162 wrote:My "informants" info based on their geographical locations still suggest otherwise sir!!
Nah, I think its just a distributional overlap between Homo clumperii and Homo splitterensis
location 4
Fincho162 wrote:My "informants" info based on their geographical locations still suggest otherwise sir!!
This seems to be a common issue these days. What we once considered to be different species or subspecies are now often considered just differently coloured populations of the same species.mickw wrote:Fincho162 wrote:My "informants" info based on their geographical locations still suggest otherwise sir!!
Nah, I think its just a distributional overlap between Homo clumperii and Homo splitterensis
I never said I agree with Forshaw - just outlining the most current thinking and what he'll be putting in his book. I had pure wild caught nigrotecta's , ex zoo, for many years and they were certainly not the same bird as the regular diggles that lived next door.Fincho162 wrote:..............great maybe unless there is no overlap and the colonies/races have differentiated/evolved in isolation.............................lets agree to disagree.............they are out there!!!!!!