This I can understand and I applaud those willing to take on the no doubt costly, heartbreaking task of bring the numbers up.Tiaris wrote:What else can these people to do to make the best use of the captive genes available than swap around as best they can among themselves whilst they collectively attempt to build/preserve numbers? (apart from sourcing fresh wild-caught stock)
If a species is considered under threat to this extent, what would the numbers be in captivity roughly? What do the numbers have to get to before more prospective breeders could get involved assuming they had the knowledge and the nerve to take them on?
(Dont have any where near the knowledge or the nerve myself so just interested in the numbers others feel would make a species viable.)
Never my intention to point a finger at anyone other than those Myzo mentioned.Tiaris wrote:Its very easy for non holders of rare species to point the finger at those who are doing the very best they can with the available genetics to preserve & ideally build up a rare species.
As Deb said a mentoring program is a great idea, there would have to be the passing of knowledge between those who already have them so hopefully anyone interested could be included so that when the time comes that numbers rise sufficiently there will be knowledgeable breeders ready with the correct habitat ready waiting.Myzomela wrote:"collectors" with no interest in breeding or insufficient experience/skill; or those too pig-headed to pass on their birds to other experienced breeders when they themselves have failed over several seasons.