On-line Forums . . Please comment

This is the spot for you to post anything and everything.
Have a good look at our other available forums before posting.
This will ensure that you post in the appropriate forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
arthur
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1999
Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 10:22

I am a sometime punter and visit a punters' forum . . Discovered this and thought it may generate some discussion on a birdos' forum


Interested in this new phenomenon of racing “chat rooms” and their correspondents, I have discussed the subject with an experienced clinical Psychologist friend and provided some examples of the contributions for her assessment and comment.

I shall share her comments and my own with you.
It is impossible to determine whether the brevity of many of the contributions demonstrates limited attention span, but it is suggestive of it.
It can be deduced from the comments that a majority of the contributors is over fifty and a significant proportion is over sixty.

Much of what is written is nostalgic and backward looking.
There is evidence that many of the contributors are obsessive and have brain damage caused, most probably, by excessive consumption of alcohol over many years.
Many of the assumed names used contain a direct reference to brain damage, alcohol or drunkenness. Some of the contributors are clearly psychotic.

There is a great deal of anger both patent and latent.
This is manifested in the extent of the comments which are merely abuse.
Disagreement does not lead to an exchange of views but to angry confrontation.
Many resort to thinly veiled references to obscenities by the use of the higher case symbols on the numerical keyboard.
There are frequent characterization of others as “imbeciles” by people who themselves betray obvious signs of feeble mentality.

This is likely the result of frustration and self loathing brought about by the losses and probably substantial losses sustained by many gambling on racehorses over a period of many years.
Whilst typing errors are a commonplace even amongst the highly educated (we have all had to learn to type and some do it much better than others) there is the clearest evidence that very many contributors have had a very limited education.
This is established by the paucity of the vocabulary and very many spelling errors (as distinct from what may be merely typos).
There are far too many for need to quote. It is apparent.

The permitted use of pseudonyms guarantees a limited anonymity that has interesting results.
There are assumed gender references akin to Internet “cross dressing”.
Where the sex roles are real there is frequent sexual and vulgar innuendo.

The frequency of “misbehaviour” suggests that many of the correspondents are unsupervised, that is that they live alone.
This is most likely the consequence of a combination of late middle or old age, addiction to gambling, brain damage caused by excess alcohol consumption over a long period and low self esteem.

Some are clearly addicted to the “chat room” itself.
They make daily contributions and sometimes many contributions on the same day, rarely rising above the banal.
This leads to a feeling togetherness and a reaction, often violent, against newcomers.
There are exchanges of thanks for “back up”.

There is a pack mentality amongst some contributors.
One even identifies himself or herself with an animal which is both a carnivorous dog and a term for a servile creature. Interesting mind there!

There is ample evidence that many live in a “Wonderland” world where the dream of getting rich by beating the game has replaced reality.
Money has become not a means of exchange and security but something akin to tokens or “Monopoly money”.
Many are hopelessly addicted gamblers.

And what of the rest? The newcomers tend to be younger and better educated.
They are polite and have not yet suffered the onset of “Korsakoff’s Syndrome”.
But they tend not to stay, either because they are driven off or rightly conclude that there is little enlightenment amongst the dross.

One is reminded of people on rubbish heap turning over the mess with a stick hoping to find something discarded but useful.
And then there are the intelligent, the well educated, the courteous, the charming, and the lovers of horse racing who enjoy the sport and the companionship and are happy to relate and share their interest and their knowledge with wit and grace.

Where are you? There are some I know but really why do you bother.

Remember the rubbish heap metaphor. Good luck!

:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
User avatar
GregH
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1671
Joined: 17 Feb 2009, 08:20
Location: Brisbane
Location: Chapel Hill, Brisbane Qld

I'm almost afraid to comment because I might implicate myself. I remember some time back wanting to get the profile of a typical finch but the task was beyond me because I lacked psychological training but I can mostly pick the ignorant from the naive and differentiate the bullshitters and from experienced experts. Probably we all have a little of each depending on the topic.

I've been wondering lately if I should get a Google Docs Excel register/poll going for a profile again for those interested in classifying themselves on a Myers-Briggs evaluation. I don't the think we're all crazy here on AFF but many of us are obsessive about finches!

On the site link given I come in with the personality profile: ISFP
The actual strength ratings (%) for the four core personality spectra evaluated are:
Introverted Sensing Feeling Perceiving
72 12 12 22
User avatar
Diane
..............................
..............................
Posts: 7402
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 14:23
Location: Northern 'burbs of Adelaide
Location: Northern 'burbs of Adelaide

Hmmm
Im an INFJ
67 25 75 11
Counsellor would be job of choice according to them.
Frighteningly accurate in parts!
Diane
The difference between Genius and Stupidity is, Genius has it’s limits
User avatar
finchbreeder
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 11629
Joined: 27 Jun 2009, 20:00
Location: Midwest of West. Aust. Coast
Location: Midwest of West.Aust.Coast

Always knew I was different, just like everyone else. ESTJ 1 50 38 22 Some of them match you.
LML
LML
User avatar
POLAR GOULDIANS
...............................
...............................
Posts: 245
Joined: 23 Jan 2009, 20:04
Location: Central QLD

Maybe it says it all about me ? But I'm not sure ?
I N T J
22 62 38 11
"Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people." -- Eleanor Roosevelt
User avatar
POLAR GOULDIANS
...............................
...............................
Posts: 245
Joined: 23 Jan 2009, 20:04
Location: Central QLD

The first time I gave the test a little thought, Just did it again very quickly and came up with this.
I N T J
33 75 62 11
I'm sure the answers were'nt that different.
"Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people." -- Eleanor Roosevelt
User avatar
Jayburd
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 5795
Joined: 08 Dec 2009, 12:08
Location: Canberra

I'm INFP
I think we all know the answer to sixteen. You can't plan a bird sale!!
Julian

Birdwatcher and finch-keeper.

Feel free to check out my photos here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lewinsrail/
And my birding antics here: http://worthtwointhebushbirding.blogspot.com.au/
User avatar
venetta
...............................
...............................
Posts: 545
Joined: 10 Nov 2011, 12:05
Location: Huntingdale, WA

Oh God...

I don't even know what to say?

Your Type is
ISTJ

22 12 1 33

You are:
slightly expressed introvert

slightly expressed sensing personality

slightly expressed thinking personality

moderately expressed judging personality
Venetta and Kylie
Image
User avatar
vettepilot_6
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 2826
Joined: 07 Aug 2011, 17:50
Location: Childers
Contact:

I 11 S 62 T 25 J 33 ....very interesting and when looked up what work I would be interested in it came up with 3 of the career paths I have chosen....
The Bitterness of Poor Quality Remains Long after the Sweetness of Cut Price is Forgotten
User avatar
finchbreeder
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 11629
Joined: 27 Jun 2009, 20:00
Location: Midwest of West. Aust. Coast
Location: Midwest of West.Aust.Coast

Any well thought out questionaire will be accurate, if honestly answered . The accuarcy leval is dictated by the scope of the questionaire however. A Yes - No respone questionaire is regretfully minimalistic and not as accurate as a Yes - Probably - Probably not - No questionaire, which is still less accurate than a 1 - 10 scale with 1 = Yes and 10 = No. It's all accurate, but relative in it's accuracy. Sorry. Despite the suggestion by this questionaire that I should be in Management, what I acctually do is Reseach via questionaires.
LML
LML
Post Reply

Return to “The Lounge”