Breeding A White Fronted Blue Hen To A Normal Cock

User avatar
peterrebecca
...............................
...............................
Posts: 90
Joined: 03 Apr 2013, 16:37
Location: Brisbane QLD

Hi,

Is it okay to pair a white fronted blue scarlet hen to a normal red fronted scarlet cock?

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Peter & Rebecca.
nswchainsaw
...............................
...............................
Posts: 398
Joined: 10 Mar 2009, 17:07
Location: Llandilo, NSW
Location: Llandilo

Yes all the young will be Normal split for Blue
User avatar
arthur
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1999
Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 10:22

Yes, if you wanted to be a purist . . and nothing wrong with that . . you would forget the 'white fronted' bit, and just call it a blue scarlet
User avatar
TomDeGraaff
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1024
Joined: 25 Jul 2012, 11:04
Location: Melbourne

I believe the white-fronted blue scarlet is actually a combination of the parblue and the seagreen - both "bluish" but separate mutations.
If you mate a white-fronted blue (of either sex) to a normal, you will end up with birds that are all split for both parblue and for seagreen.
User avatar
Alf63
...............................
...............................
Posts: 176
Joined: 31 Oct 2011, 13:20
Location: victoria

Tom,

You are correct. Split for both.

Alf63
User avatar
TomDeGraaff
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1024
Joined: 25 Jul 2012, 11:04
Location: Melbourne

Thanks, Alf.
It probably sounds a bit pedantic but if you mate two "split white-fronteds" together, the chance of getting a white-fronted chick is a lot less than two splits for a single factor. People who buy pairs of "split white-fronted" would be disappointed in the likely proportion of white-fronted young. In truth, they should not be described that way, they should be called double splits.
Cheers
Tom
User avatar
Myzomela
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1545
Joined: 24 Jan 2011, 18:44
Location: Melbourne Vic

And just to confuse things I think originally there was also another white fronted blue scarlet which was a single mutation. I am not sure how it differed visually from the ones Tom is talking about (if at all) but I suspect they all got mixed up and the true recessive wfb scarlet was lost.
Research; evaluate;observe;act
User avatar
arthur
...............................
...............................
Posts: 1999
Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 10:22

Myzomela wrote:And just to confuse things I think originally there was also another white fronted blue scarlet which was a single mutation. I am not sure how it differed visually from the ones Tom is talking about (if at all) but I suspect they all got mixed up and the true recessive wfb scarlet was lost.
Well you live and learn . .

Terry Martin's book refers to the AR Blue Scarlet as a primary mutation which must have been the one referred to above as lost
User avatar
peterrebecca
...............................
...............................
Posts: 90
Joined: 03 Apr 2013, 16:37
Location: Brisbane QLD

Thanks for the fantastic replies everyone.

Peter & Rebecca.
User avatar
SamDavis
...............................
...............................
Posts: 2578
Joined: 03 Jan 2011, 14:01
Location: Douglas Park NSW

Uraeginthus wrote:Thanks, Alf.
It probably sounds a bit pedantic but if you mate two "split white-fronteds" together, the chance of getting a white-fronted chick is a lot less than two splits for a single factor. People who buy pairs of "split white-fronted" would be disappointed in the likely proportion of white-fronted young. In truth, they should not be described that way, they should be called double splits.
Cheers
Tom
I'm learning too - I thought the white front blues were a single mutation.
Split to split you get 1/4 coloured. So double split to double split the chance of double coloured (white-front blue) is 1/4 times 1/4 which is 1/16. At least you'll know what the double coloured are whereas the remaining 15/16 will just be a cacophony of this and that.
(NB. the word cacophony is used entirely in an attempt to impress Arthur - hope I have the context correct!)
Post Reply

Return to “Parrots”