Hi,
Is it okay to pair a white fronted blue scarlet hen to a normal red fronted scarlet cock?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Peter & Rebecca.
Breeding A White Fronted Blue Hen To A Normal Cock
- peterrebecca
- ...............................
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 03 Apr 2013, 16:37
- Location: Brisbane QLD
-
- ...............................
- Posts: 398
- Joined: 10 Mar 2009, 17:07
- Location: Llandilo, NSW
- Location: Llandilo
Yes all the young will be Normal split for Blue
- TomDeGraaff
- ...............................
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: 25 Jul 2012, 11:04
- Location: Melbourne
I believe the white-fronted blue scarlet is actually a combination of the parblue and the seagreen - both "bluish" but separate mutations.
If you mate a white-fronted blue (of either sex) to a normal, you will end up with birds that are all split for both parblue and for seagreen.
If you mate a white-fronted blue (of either sex) to a normal, you will end up with birds that are all split for both parblue and for seagreen.
- TomDeGraaff
- ...............................
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: 25 Jul 2012, 11:04
- Location: Melbourne
Thanks, Alf.
It probably sounds a bit pedantic but if you mate two "split white-fronteds" together, the chance of getting a white-fronted chick is a lot less than two splits for a single factor. People who buy pairs of "split white-fronted" would be disappointed in the likely proportion of white-fronted young. In truth, they should not be described that way, they should be called double splits.
Cheers
Tom
It probably sounds a bit pedantic but if you mate two "split white-fronteds" together, the chance of getting a white-fronted chick is a lot less than two splits for a single factor. People who buy pairs of "split white-fronted" would be disappointed in the likely proportion of white-fronted young. In truth, they should not be described that way, they should be called double splits.
Cheers
Tom
- Myzomela
- ...............................
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: 24 Jan 2011, 18:44
- Location: Melbourne Vic
And just to confuse things I think originally there was also another white fronted blue scarlet which was a single mutation. I am not sure how it differed visually from the ones Tom is talking about (if at all) but I suspect they all got mixed up and the true recessive wfb scarlet was lost.
Research; evaluate;observe;act
- arthur
- ...............................
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 10:22
Well you live and learn . .Myzomela wrote:And just to confuse things I think originally there was also another white fronted blue scarlet which was a single mutation. I am not sure how it differed visually from the ones Tom is talking about (if at all) but I suspect they all got mixed up and the true recessive wfb scarlet was lost.
Terry Martin's book refers to the AR Blue Scarlet as a primary mutation which must have been the one referred to above as lost
- peterrebecca
- ...............................
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 03 Apr 2013, 16:37
- Location: Brisbane QLD
Thanks for the fantastic replies everyone.
Peter & Rebecca.
Peter & Rebecca.
- SamDavis
- ...............................
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: 03 Jan 2011, 14:01
- Location: Douglas Park NSW
I'm learning too - I thought the white front blues were a single mutation.Uraeginthus wrote:Thanks, Alf.
It probably sounds a bit pedantic but if you mate two "split white-fronteds" together, the chance of getting a white-fronted chick is a lot less than two splits for a single factor. People who buy pairs of "split white-fronted" would be disappointed in the likely proportion of white-fronted young. In truth, they should not be described that way, they should be called double splits.
Cheers
Tom
Split to split you get 1/4 coloured. So double split to double split the chance of double coloured (white-front blue) is 1/4 times 1/4 which is 1/16. At least you'll know what the double coloured are whereas the remaining 15/16 will just be a cacophony of this and that.
(NB. the word cacophony is used entirely in an attempt to impress Arthur - hope I have the context correct!)