

location 4
On the whole I agree with what tiaris has said. While I am personally uncomfortable with the shooting of native waterfowl, I am more comfortable with the concept of all the waterfowl shot being consumed by the person shooting them. I much prefer the idea of shoting for food rather than sport. I feel the same way about fishing. Ethically I see less of an issue taking a couple of birds from the wild for an aviary than taking a duck or a fish for sport.Craig52 wrote:I agree Tiaris,but these are not classed as aviary birds though some people keep them as such and being a native animal you are required to have a licence to do so,so yes you would be in the wrong.Tiaris wrote:I'm quite concerned that previously common survival skills such as hunting, fishing & killing one's own livestock for the table are being progressively more discouraged as our society becomes more environmentally & animal welfare "conscious".
At the same time, I find it remarkably hypocritical that I am allowed to kill 10 wild ducks per day for a defined period yet if during that same period I was to keep a pair of the same species in my aviaries for the purposes of keeping them alive & breeding from them without obtaining a licence & paying a fee to the same government I would be guilty of breaking the law & fined for so doing.
Hunters pay for a shooters licence as well as a game licence yearly.They also pay for a WIT test (Wildfowl Identification Test) and if you don't pass it you don't get a game licence.
Anyway,my life style and my choice. Cheers Craig
Getting a bit off topic, but 100% in agreementiaos wrote:. Ethically I see less of an issue taking a couple of birds from the wild for an aviary than taking a duck or a fish for sport.